Updated Guidelines Regarding Church Gatherings

Dear UU Churchers,
We write as Board President, President-Elect, and Minister to update you on decisions around the use of our church building as we continue to discern how to best “be church” in this global Pandemic. At its June 18 meeting, your Board of Trustees spent most of its time together discussing various questions around in-person gatherings. We were informed by the work of the Unitarian Universalist Association in their recommendations, our best understanding of the science, and the emerging policies of sister congregations.
We seek at all times to draw our focus back to our church’s mission, asking ourselves how we can best, “In the spirit of courageous love, forge a community of radical welcome and deep connection that moves us together to heal the world” during a pandemic. Particularly at this moment, we recognize the tension between our need for deep connection and our mission to create a space of radical welcome that is accessible to those most vulnerable. 
We are proud of the ways that our ministry teams and staff have found to creatively maintain and even build our connections online in this time of physical distancing, and we recognize the desire to find safe ways to experience in-person connections. We know that our best wisdom about this will continue to evolve, and we invite your participation in this unfolding discernment. In this moment, here is what we have decided:
  1. Because of the rapidly changing nature of the situation and the continually emerging science around this novel disease, we need a dedicated team of folks discerning where our risk tolerance and our church’s mission meet. The Board will establish a Pandemic Response Team charged with consistently assessing best practice around all kinds of in-person gatherings and advising the Board and Minister with recommended changes in procedure. 
  2. In agreement with our Worship Associates, we affirm the UUA’s recommendation that all member congregations plan to continue worshiping together online-only through May of 2021. While we dearly await the day when we can safely gather in person, we believe that our mission of radical welcome and deep connection is actually better served by focusing our efforts on high quality online worship rather than offering a severely limited in-person option that would necessarily exclude more vulnerable populations. If the situation unexpectedly changes for the better before May 2021 and our Pandemic Response Team recommends it, we will certainly consider joyfully regathering at that time. 
  3. Church small groups are permitted to gather on church grounds outdoors and are strongly encouraged to wear masks and maintain a distance of 6 feet or more. We encourage groups who are considering an in-person meeting at any location to openly discuss the needs and risk tolerance of the group first and to make clear agreements. What are the needs of the most vulnerable person in your group, and how can you assure those needs are fully met? One way to avoid “group-think” on this matter may be for a group leader to chat one-on-one with each group member before holding a larger conversation with the full group, so that everyone can comfortably express their needs. 
  4. The church building remains closed to all church and community groups at least until the Pandemic Response Team can thoroughly research questions about cleaning procedures, room capacities, and other best practices. The board and ministries will then assess our capacity to execute the recommendations of the Team.
  5. Any individual entering the church building will be required to wear a mask. Masks will be provided for those who do not have their own, and exceptions may be made in the case of physical or mental health needs. Staff working in enclosed offices may remove their mask while alone inside their office.
  6. Staff may work on site in their enclosed office spaces if desired. Staff will maintain at least six feet of distance from other individuals in the building, will wear masks when not alone inside their enclosed offices, and will frequently wipe down high touch surfaces. Staff who prefer to work from home exclusively are very welcome to do so.
  7. An individual or family unit may enter the building to complete church business, but will limit their time to the needed purpose, will wear masks unless they are certain no one else is using the space, will maintain appropriate distance, and will wipe down high touch surfaces they may have used with provided disinfecting wipes, before leaving. 
In Faith,
Mindy McPherson, Board President
Rebecca Graves, Board President-Elect
Rev. Molly Housh Gordon, Minister

Joint Letter to the Congregation from Board President & Minister

Joint Letter from Board President Mindy McPherson and Rev. Molly Housh Gordon

Dear UU Churchers,

With gratitude for the generosity and care of this community, we write together to share with you some of the discernment and decisions of your Board of Trustees and Minister in this uncertain time. We have been moved by all of the ways you have been supporting one another and voicing your support to our leadership. The courageous love, radical welcome, and deep connection of our congregation is undiminished.

  1. Our building closure – It seems clear that the UUCC building will remain closed at least through May. We will be working with a team of UU Churchers to discern together the circumstances under which we will be comfortable opening our building and resuming various kinds of in-person gatherings. This is less a question of a certain date and more a question of what science-based criteria will need to be met in order for us to feel that we are making a responsible decision for the health and wellbeing of our members and the general population – criteria such as widespread testing and availability of protective equipment. It seems wise to consider the possibility that it will be quite some time before it is safe to gather in the large numbers we usually see in our Sunday morning services. We grieve physical presence to one another in this time and are committed to continuing to innovate in creating deep community across any necessary distance.
  2. Our annual meeting – While typically held in the month of May, our bylaws (Article 4, Section 3) state that the annual congregational meeting shall be held during the last fiscal quarter. In order to have as much information as possible and time to figure out the technology, your Board of Trustees has scheduled our annual meeting a bit later than usual, on Sunday, June 7. To maintain social distancing, this congregational discussion will be held virtually. We will use a secure digital platform to conduct elections of new board members and adopt the budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
  3. Our budget – We believe it is prudent to anticipate a difficult financial situation in the coming year given the economic upheaval we are all currently experiencing. We know some among us have lost jobs, job security, income, savings, and/or investments, and that there may be more loss to come (please reach out to Rev. Molly about our church Benevolence funds if you are in need of assistance – we currently have a healthy balance in those funds). We anticipate this reality will affect annual giving to the church, and we are budgeting accordingly. All payroll and ministry team budget lines will be held flat at their FY2020 levels as we create the budget for FY2021, and we will seek any necessary cuts in the least painful areas first, such as board discretionary spending. Thankfully, we know that our members and friends are committed to our congregation and will continue to give at the levels they are able to afford in their own circumstances. Additionally, because of the wisdom of many lay leaders over many years, we have a healthy reserve and emergency fund, which we will draw upon as necessary to weather this time of global crisis. Between these resources and a conservative approach to spending, we believe that we will emerge from this downturn intact.
  4. Our application for additional resources – After much in-depth discussion about the many pros and cons of participating in the program, the board voted at its April meeting to apply on behalf of the congregation for a Payroll Protection Program loan from the Small Business Administration. If our application is accepted and funded, we believe that participation in this program can provide additional security in the coming months, as we are faced with uncertainties in our income from pledges and other revenue sources. Specifically, this will help us keep our commitments to all of our staff, including hourly Sunday morning staff. When we continue our commitment to keep our staff on payroll, the loan will be forgiven. The additional financial security helps to ensure that we continue to effectively carry out our mission and champion social and economic justice in Columbia and beyond.
  5. Rev. Molly’s sabbatical is postponed – After discernment and consultation with various leaders, Rev. Molly has decided to delay her sabbatical by one year, in order to remain steadily present to the congregation through the uncertainty of the coming days and months. This delay will also help ensure that Molly’s sabbatical allows for rest and renewal as intended. The new sabbatical dates will be May 10 to September 7, 2021.
  6. Our commitment to and agreement with Rev. Dr. CW Dawson – Your board and Rev. Molly unanimously agree that the just and faithful approach to our changed sabbatical plans is to honor the commitment and employment agreement we entered into with Rev. Dr. CW Dawson for this summer. We also believe that this will be a fruitful decision for the congregation, who will benefit this summer from the Rev. Dawson’s many gifts. Rev. Molly and Rev. Dawson are working to revise the sabbatical minister job description a Philosopher-in-Residence position and are very much looking forward to the opportunity to work together this summer. We hope that we will also be able to enter another agreement with Rev. Dawson next summer to lead through the rescheduled sabbatical, as we had planned. However, we expect we will need to delay that decision until we have more information about our financial circumstances as they unfold in the coming year.

Please do be in touch with any questions, concerns, or thoughts you might have about how we can continue to practice courageous love and deep connection in new and unfolding ways as we endure these strange and troubling times.

In Faith,
Mindy McPherson, Board President, and Rev. Molly Housh Gordon, Minister


Got brain fog? Some pastoral resources…

Dear UU Churchers,

On Friday of last week, after a morning full of kid care, it was finally my turn to get into the home office. I was looking forward to the work I planned to do with and for our congregation that afternoon, but I found that instead feeling ready to jump right in, my brain felt foggy and floaty. I couldn’t connect my thoughts, and the words I needed to write felt just out of reach. I had to spend the first part of my precious work time that day lying down, meditating, and trying to calm and clear my system enough to function.

What we are experiencing right now is a collective, slow-moving trauma, as the Covid-19 pandemic spreads and our lives shift dramatically in response. Trauma has a profound impact on the brain and body. If you are feeling fatigue, insomnia, muscle tension or aching, sleepiness, inertia or lack of motivation, over-functioning or hyper-activity, irritability, forgetfulness, brain fog, or any number of other troublesome experiences right now, know that you are not alone, and know that your ancient brain is trying to protect you with fight, flight, or freeze responses. Spend some time breathing deeply. Lie down or go for a walk. Do the things that tell your own body that you are safe and well.

Then, when you feel able, take a look at these resources from the UU Trauma Response Ministry, who have created a simple list of the signs and symptoms of extreme stress or trauma and some things to try to help soothe your system. For caregivers of children, they have also created a helpful list of common experiences of children of different ages during traumatic times and matching suggestions for how adults can support them.

If at any time you could use further support, or more in-depth resources, please don’t hesitate to be in touch.

With love,
Rev. Molly


How to join worship and meetings by Zoom

Step 1. Set Up Zoom

Setting up on a mobile device:

  • You do not need a Zoom account (but please know that accounts are free).
  • For a smart phone or tablet, look for the Zoom app in the app store and download.
    • “Zoom Cloud Meetings” – it’s free.
    • “Zoom for Blackberry” for Blackberry users – also free.
  • When it’s time for your meeting or worship, launch the app and click “Join a Meeting.” Enter the meeting ID to access the meeting or worship.

Setting up on a computer:

  • You do not need a Zoom account (but please know that accounts are free).
  • Go to this page and download “Zoom Client for Meetings.”
  • Find “Zoom.pkg” in your downloads and double-click it to install the application.
  • When it’s time for your meeting or worship, click the link and the Zoom application will launch automatically. Or launch the Zoom application and click “Join a Meeting.” Enter the meeting ID (to access the meeting or worship.

Step 2. Attend worship or meetings

The links and Zoom ID numbers will be on the home page.

For audio only, you can call in on the phone if you prefer: The phone number and Zoom ID numbers will be on the home page.

UUCC in-person gatherings suspended and how to stay connected

In the spirit of love for our community and human family, we are temporarily suspending all in-person church gatherings starting Sunday morning, March 15 and moving our worship, programs, and ministries to the many technologies available to help us stay connected – phone, email, Facebook, and Zoom videoconferencing. As Unitarian Universalists, we believe that our interdependence is both a gift and a sacred responsibility, and as Staff and Board of Trustees, we have learned from public health officials and the Unitarian Universalist Association that the best way to practice care for our community and responsibility to our interdependence is to take early and decisive action on closures and cancellations of large events. This decision, then, is not a signal for anxiety but rather our way to practice care and embody love by protecting vulnerable populations and doing our part to ensure that our health care system does not become overwhelmed by the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic. This is as an effort to #flattenthecurve of disease spread.

This decision is effective at least until the end of March and possibly longer. Your leadership will be revisiting the best available information regularly to determine when we can joyfully resume our in-person programs.

How to stay connected and how we can help

Worship and programs – Our interdependence is a responsibility, but also a gift – it is more important than ever that we each know we are not alone, but accompanied by a community who love us! We will be reaching out often to provide spiritual grounding, anxiety-reducing resources, and companionship. Your staff and volunteers are working very hard to get all of these supports up and running and will continue to do so for the duration of this time. Look for lots more on this in the coming days. For now know that our ministry teams and chalice circles are strongly encouraged to continue meeting using Zoom videoconferencing and that we will be using Zoom and/or Facebook Live to provide Sunday worship experience, regular grounding meditations and moments, content for kids and families, check-ins, and more. We will be providing opportunities in the coming days for you to learn about how to use these simple softwares to connect face to face. Look for a separate email soon with details about worshipping from home THIS Sunday.

Pastoral care – Please let Rev. Molly know if you are sick, self-quarantined, anxious, or otherwise struggling, so that she, our Lay Pastoral Caregivers, and our Caring Ministry team can be of support to you. We are also working on creating an email/phone tree to help all of our congregation check in on each other, and a resource share to allow for our community to offer and provide help to one another. We are here to help each other calm and soothe in anxious times and support our mental health. As well as providing pastoral support, Rev. Molly is also available to provide mental healthcare referrals. If you would like to be a part of offering support to others, let Rev. Molly know that too!

Material/financial support – Social distancing and potential self-quarantine are economically difficult in a society with such tenuous social safety nets. This distancing helps those most medically vulnerable, but is also challenging for those most financially vulnerable. To address this, we will be continuing to compensate all of our staff, including hourly and nursery staff at their usual rates and hours despite cancellations. If you or someone close to you needs assistance with lost wages, medical supplies and support, or basic necessities, please let Rev. Molly know so that we may activate our Benevolence & Minister’s Discretionary Funds to help. If you or someone close to you needs groceries or medical supplies delivered to you, let us know. In contrast, if you are not affected by financial vulnerability in this moment and are able to make an additional gift to the congregation’s funds, we welcome your support.

Supporting the wider community – It is a calling of our community to support those who are both medically and financially vulnerable in these times. Here are few thoughts we’ve had about that: If you are stocking up on non-perishable food items like pasta and sauce, rice and beans, tuna, peanut butter and other basics, basic medical items like ibuprofen, cough drops, tissues, gatorade, etc. or entertainment items like books, games, coloring books and markers, puzzles etc., consider buying a few extra and dropping them by the church entryway, where we will put together some quarantine kits to distribute to those who find themselves in need. We also invite you to contact our city councillors and state legislators to advocate for a moratorium on evictions and funding for emergency paid sick leave during this time. And, we encourage those of you with the means to do so, to consider making an additional gift to your favorite local direct service agency as we all scramble to assist those most impacted by this disruption.

I’d like to close by offering you this poem that has helped me reframe from fear to love in these historic and troubling times.

By Lynne Ungar

What if you thought of it
as the Jews consider the Sabbath-
the most sacred of times?
Cease from travel.
Cease from buying and selling.
Give up, just for now,
on trying to make the world
different than it is.
Sing. Pray. Touch only those
to whom you commit your life.
Center down.

And when your body has become still,
reach out with your heart.
Know that we are connected
in ways that are terrifying and beautiful.
(You could hardly deny it now.)
Know that our lives
are in one another’s hands.
(Surely, that has come clear.)
Do not reach out your hands.
Reach out your heart.
Reach out your words.
Reach out all the tendrils
of compassion that move, invisibly,
where we cannot touch.

Promise this world your love–
for better or for worse,
in sickness and in health,
so long as we all shall live.

Sending you greatest love and a deep wish for health and hope,

Rev. Molly


Staff Transition News

It is with great celebration of more than 25 wonderful years of service that I write to inform you of Kathie Bergman’s decision to retire from her position of Church Administrator in the Fall of 2018.

Kathie wishes to communicate her sincere gratitude for the trust and friendship of the UU members during her employment. She plans to remain an active member of the church and to enjoy new opportunities to be of service to the community!

I wish to express our deep gratitude for Kathie’s service and for the gifts of both administrative excellence and deep warmth and care that Kathie brought to her role for so many years. We will have a chance to celebrate Kathie’s years of service in the fall.

Kathie’s professional gifts and institutional wisdom will be deeply missed, but I feel confident in our ability to locate and hire a successor who will continue Kathie’s excellence. I am pleased to report that Kathie herself will attend to the training of our next Administrator prior to her departure. A search for that person will begin in the summer months.

Between now and Kathie’s retirement in the Fall, I am sure you will find opportunities both small and large to appreciate Kathie’s contributions over the years, and I encourage you to do so!

In Faith,
Rev. Molly Housh Gordon

“The African American Church in America” 8-week Adult Education Series

“The African American Church in America” 
with the Rev. Dr. Clanton C.W. Dawson Jr.

8-Week Adult Education Series

Weekly from Wednesday, July 26 through Wednesday, Sept. 13
6:30-7:45 p.m.
In the Sanctuary of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Columbia
2615 Shepard Blvd. 
The Rev. Dr. Clanton C.W. Dawson Jr.

Join us for an exciting adult education series with friend-of-UUCC Rev. Dr. C.W. Dawson Jr. We’ll gather for eight weeks starting Wednesday, July 26 to delve into the history, theology, and culture of the African American Church tradition in America.

Those of you who have worshiped with Pastor Dawson know that his engaging style is surpassed only by his breadth of expertise. Don’t miss this chance to learn together. You are welcome to drop in to one, several, or all eight sessions.

RSVPs are appreciated but not required. Childcare will be made available upon request with at least one week’s notice.

Check out Dr. Dawson’s course description!

Sanctuary FAQ

Printable PDF version of FAQ

As our congregation faithfully discerns our call to compassionate action in solidarity with those most vulnerable in this time, please see the following Frequently Asked Questions about becoming a Sanctuary Congregation:

  1. What is sanctuary?

(Answer from the UU College of Social Justice)

The original concept of religious spaces as sanctuary for refugees is rooted in Judaism. The ancient Hebrew people allowed temples and even whole cities to declare themselves places of refuge for persons accused of a crime which they may not have committed. This practice allowed those wrongfully accused to escape swift and harsh retribution until they could receive a fair trial.

In the late Roman Empire, fugitives sometimes found refuge in Christian churches. Later, during the medieval period, the English common law permitted an accused felon to seek sanctuary in a church, and then choose either to submit to trial or to confess and leave the country.

In the United States, the first practical case of anything like sanctuary occurred in the years before the Civil War, when slaves fleeing through the Underground Railroad found safety along the way in churches and private homes throughout the country. Another example occurred during the Vietnam War, when some churches opened their doors to young men resisting the draft. This gave temporary refuge to the resistor, and allowed the congregations to amplify their religious message against war.

In the 1980s, refugees from military oppression and civil wars in Central America began to flee to the United States. The U.S. government did not recognize them as political refugees, even though many were threatened by death squads in their home countries. The Sanctuary Movement was born in response, first established at the Southside Presbyterian Church in Tucson, AZ. At its strongest, the movement included over 500 congregations that collaborated to move refugees through the United States to safe houses and safe congregations.

Several decades later, beginning in 2007, the New Sanctuary Movement took shape among coalitions of congregations in cities throughout the country. As immigration raids in neighborhoods and work places escalated these congregations opened their doors to provide refuge to those facing deportation. The New Sanctuary Movement helped stop thousands of deportations through case-by-case advocacy.

  1. What has been the UU history and tradition of sanctuary?

(Answer from the UU College of Social Justice)

Our congregations have exercised their faith in the inherent worth and dignity of all people since our earliest history by providing shelter and succor to those experiencing oppression. Some Unitarian and Universalist individuals and communities were participants in the Underground Railroad and anti-slavery movement in the United States. The founding of the Unitarian Service Committee was an effort to help migrants and refugees escape Nazi occupation leading up to World War II. And the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) and the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC) were both deeply involved in supporting the Sanctuary Movement of the 1980s.

In May 2007, the UUA became the first national religious denomination to endorse the New Sanctuary Movement, grounding this support in UU history with the original Sanctuary Movement, our sources and principles, and prior statements by the UUA General Assembly regarding immigration. These statements strongly condemn the current immigration system, support immigration reform, and encourage support for immigrants, regardless of immigration status. In 2013, the General Assembly passed a Statement of Conscience titled “Immigration as a Moral Issue.”

In January 2017, the UUA and UUSC together issued a new Declaration of Conscience denouncing the first Executive Orders from the Trump administration and calling on our faith communities to translate our values into active resistance. Several UU congregations are currently providing sanctuary, and 44 UU congregations have declared sanctuary status.

  1. What would we be asked to do if we decided to become a Sanctuary Congregation?

We would first be asked to publicly declare our status as a sanctuary congregation. The more congregations that declare this status, the safer it becomes for congregations and for those seeking sanctuary.

We would be asked to be a part of a network of churches and individuals offering public advocacy in support of immigrants, refugees, and others at risk in the current political climate, and to be a part of a network offering education opportunities for individuals to know their legal rights.

We would be agreeing to offer physical sanctuary to an individual or family as a legal strategy for negotiating a legal stay of deportation for as long as such a legal process requires. This could be as short as days, more commonly weeks or months, or in some rare instances as long as a year or more. This person would live for that period of time on our property.

A request to offer physical sanctuary could come days, weeks, months, or never, after declaring sanctuary, depending on our ongoing local situation and context.

  1. Who would take sanctuary?

Most often, an individual without legal immigration status takes sanctuary as a legal strategy to avoid deportation while negotiations are ongoing. Sanctuary is not an indefinite living situation, but a means to gain some kind of legal status to return to one’s life and/or family in the United States.

The Faith Voices Sanctuary network would accept potential sanctuary recipients by standards mutually agreed upon by the network and the sanctuary congregation – such as good potential for legal victory, lack of violent criminal offenses, etc. The sanctuary congregation would always have final say in the matter.

  1. Would we be acting alone?

Not at all. Our local Faith Voices chapter is creating a broad network of individuals and congregations in Columbia who will provide substantial logistical, volunteer, legal, and financial support to the efforts of sanctuary congregations.

In addition, national sanctuary networks provide legal and advisory resources in partnership with churches across the country and large organizations such as the ACLU.

Our Unitarian Universalist Association supports and encourages the work of sanctuary congregations with free consulting and other resources. At this time 44 Unitarian Universalist congregations across the country have declared themselves sanctuary congregations.

  1. Can the church as an institution be held legally liable?

While there is some risk of the church as an institution being held liable under laws against harboring persons not authorized to be in the U.S., over the last forty years no congregation has been prosecuted for allowing undocumented people to find shelter and safety in its house of worship.

In previous court cases in other circuits, harboring has been interpreted to involve the intent to conceal, whereas sanctuary is a public act with no intent to conceal. The federal circuit court of appeals presiding over our area to our knowledge has never ruled in such a case one way or the other.

There is no law providing for sanctuary, but Federal agents are advised by longstanding written federal policy that they are to avoid entering “sensitive areas,” including churches, hospitals, schools, mosques, temples and synagogues. Though we do not know if this policy will continue in the current administration, immigration officials know that if they went into a house of worship to make an arrest they would have a public relations challenge on their hands.

However, if such a situation were to arise and immigration officials came to a sanctuary church with a warrant, the network encourages that we not break the law by preventing their entry, but rather document, witness, and activate a rapid response network to provide physical presence of protest and press attention to the situation.

  1. What about possible legal liability for individual church members?

UUCC is registered as a Missouri non-profit corporation. Under Missouri law, individual members cannot be held personally liable for the actions of the church, according to Missouri Revised Statute 355.197, subsection 1.

An individual member would only be legally liable if they, personally, decided to break the law, such as by blocking the entrance of law enforcement with a legal warrant. While each individual may make their own choices in such instances, such behavior is not requested or encouraged.

  1. What are the practical and logistical considerations?

A person entering sanctuary cannot leave the site of sanctuary until their legal case is resolved, unless the person decided to give up and end the sanctuary and risk arrest and deportation, which would be extremely rare. This means the person needs a room to live in, access to food and kitchen facilities, bathing facilities, and good internet. Company is also important and our Faith Voices network is recruiting a large corps of volunteers to provide logistical support such as meals and company.

Regarding physical space, we have identified a classroom that is not in regular use and have consulted with facilities volunteers about a strategy to create a showering solution. An individual in sanctuary would require regular access to the downstairs kitchen.

We know that living space in the lower level of a church is not ideal for an individual, or for the convenience of church programs. Yet, the alternative in cases of sanctuary is often between an imperfect but compassionate living situation in sanctuary vs. detention with little legal recourse in for-profit and inhumanely run detention centers.

  1. What are other risks? 

We don’t know all of the risks and benefits of an act of faith like declaring sanctuary. We do know that some congregations have received hate mail or vandalism because of their position on this and other progressive issues.

Truly, the biggest question for us to consider in this decision is the same as any other act of moral courage: What does love require us to risk? Where does the strength of our hearts meet the calling of our faith in these times? 

UU Church Discerns Offering Sanctuary

In my sermon on February 19, I announced that our partners at Missouri Faith Voices have invited us to become a part of a local network of congregations offering solidarity, support, and even sanctuary to individuals facing deportation or detention because of their immigration status, religion, or other identity. Your Board of Trustees has charged and authorized our ministries to pursue a process of discernment about whether to declare ourselves as a Sanctuary congregation. Although we would be the first UU church to declare sanctuary in Missouri, our UUA is a leader in the current sanctuary movement nationwide, and our sister congregation in Denver is currently serving as sanctuary for an undocumented mother and community activist

Begin Learning Now

Our Unitarian Universalist association has a wealth of resources on the work of sanctuary.

And our UUA President The Rev. Peter Morales has issued a statement calling UU congregations to prophetic witness in these times.

Our Process

Please join us for one of these two identical conversations as our congregation discerns whether to formally declare ourselves a sanctuary congregation and promise protection to those facing detention or deportation because of who they are, where they are from, or what they stand for. Childcare and light meal provided. If you are unable to make one of these times but wish to join the conversation, please reply directly to me for a potential third opportunity. 

Sanctuary Discernment Conversations

Saturday morning, March 11, 9-10:30 a.m. and
Thursday evening, March 16, 5:30-7 p.m.
Sunday afternoon, April 2, 12:30-2:30 p.m.
Monday evening, April 3, 6-8 p.m.

If further follow up is needed after these two meetings, we will continue the process with further conversations as necessary. After a time of discussing legal and logistical questions, our capacity for risk and moral courage, and the calling of our faith, we will hold a congregational vote about this designation at 10am between the services on Sunday, April 9. 

Sanctuary Vote

Sunday, April 9, 10 a.m. between services

If you have questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me or one of the team working on this process: Allie Gassmann, Dave Gibbons, and Janice Smith. 

In Faith,
Rev. Molly

Introducing Our New DRE – Jamila Batchelder

Click photo to enlarge

I am excited to introduce to you our new Director of Religious Education, Jamila Batchelder.

Many of you may know Jamila from her long time involvement in many facets of our congregation – from teaching in our RE program in the Schweitzer class, to volunteer youth advising and coordination of our high school youth program, to facilitating chalice circles for a group of parents and a multi-age group, to acting as worship associate.

From these UUCC experiences, Jamila brings a deep love of Unitarian Universalism and an understanding of our programs, our worship life, and congregational dynamics.

From her personal life, she brings a multi-faith background, knowledge of many wisdom traditions and spiritual practices, and profound theological grounding.

From her professional life, Jamila brings experience as an educator, a researcher, and a coordinator of youth programs, and a proven track record of creative collaboration that is based in relationship and committed to getting things done. As one reference expressed: Jamila brings out the best in people and makes volunteering easy and fun.

As you can see from her Philosophy of RE statement, Jamila brings a clear and exciting vision for our program, one cornerstone of which is ensuring that our program is deeply informed by the needs of our young people and families.

Jamila is extremely conversant in developmental needs across the age span and has the skills to help ensure the inclusion of children and youth with many learning styles and needs. She brings with her an attitude of empathy and an intuition that we feel confident will serve each unique UU child as they learn and grow as individuals.

Her promising vision for our RE program includes collaborative, multi-generational ways for our community to develop ever-deeper connections across every age. She also aims to provide support for families who wish to further extend UU principles and practices at home. As Jamila stated poignantly in her interview: “As Unitarian Universalists, we may not always be able to give our children easy answers. Therefore, we must be willing to give them ourselves.”

I look forward to having Jamila as a partner in ministry as she brings her many gifts to the professional staff of our congregation.

Jamila will begin work with us officially on November 17. Look out next week for a message from Jamila, and keep an eye out for upcoming opportunities to chat with her about your hopes for our Religious Education program.

To learn more about our search process and our efforts to mitigate bias, please keep scrolling!


The Search Process

In our governance structure, the hiring and supervision of staff is delegated to the minister. It is highly advisable for the minister to consult with stakeholders about their needs when preparing to make staffing decisions. Particularly with program positions such as Director of Religious Education, best practice involves engaging a team of stakeholders as a Search Team in an advisory capacity. Though the Search Team does not take a binding vote, or make a final decision, their input is invaluable throughout the process.

In August I convened a Search Team to advise me in the pursuit of hiring a new Director of Religious Education. This Team included representation from the RE Team, the YRUU advisors, Parents of current RE participants, and those with historical/institutional knowledge of our programs. The team consisted of Joe Collins, Paul Ladehoff, Tracey Milarsky, Dennis Murphy, and Chelsea Otten.

Together this team examined our job description, determined it was up to date, and considered how we might weigh our priorities for the position. We advertised the position to the congregation, to the Columbia community (particularly through the local college and university job boards), and to regional and national UU networks.

Knowing that we might be considering a church member candidate, and that inevitably such a candidate would have many different relationships with individuals in the congregation and on the search team, we engaged our UUA Regional Staff early and often for advice about creating a process that was as fair as possible in our context.

Together, we created a covenant for mitigating bias, which is included below. The team worked diligently to hold one another accountable to this covenant, and I feel confident that the advising I received from the team before making a final decision was careful and deeply considered.

I thank everyone for their patience in a process that was lengthened by careful work and the reality of juggling busy volunteer schedules.

DRE Search Team Covenant for Mitigating Bias

When considering a church member for this position, we do hereby covenant to mitigate our personal bias in these ways:

  1. We will not discuss anything about candidates or the process with others outside the search team, especially the candidates themselves.
  2. We will be consistent in process with all candidates, asking the same questions in the same ways as much as possible, knowing that follow up may be necessary.   
  3. We will verbally remind ourselves prior to each interview and conversation about a candidate to set aside bias as much as possible.
  4. Prior to each interview and conversation with a candidate, we will name our emotions surrounding the interview, conversation, or relationship, and we will go through an exercise of setting aside those feelings for a time.
  5. We will consider both strengths and weaknesses of each candidate.
  6. We will consider relevant knowledge about the candidate in relation to church experience but will endeavor to consciously set aside personal relationships and feelings related to those relationships.
  7. In discussions regarding a candidate, we will hold one another accountable to our covenant, naming when we hear comments that engage bias or feelings that could become bias, and seeking to balance those comments with further considerations. 

UUCC welcomes Affiliated Community Minister the Rev. Dottie Mathews

Rev. Dottie delivers a sermon.
The Rev. Dottie Mathews preaches at UUCC.

Our faith is one of covenant and relationship, wherein the relationship to the congregational body is a defining one for any minister.

And yet we recognize the powerful need for ministry beyond the walls of our congregations and the deep value of those who serve not primarily in the congregation, but in the wider community. We call this ministry community ministry.

Community ministers are chaplains, spiritual directors, justice-advocates and activists, non-profit managers, youth mentors, and more.

In the Unitarian Universalist tradition, community ministry is celebrated, and it is also, at its best, rooted in congregations, accountable to gatherings of Unitarian Universalists as the central site of our faith.

Therefore, it is recommended and encouraged by the UUA, Unitarian Universalist Ministers Association (UUMA) and Unitarian Universalist Society for Community Ministries (UUSCM) that all community ministers maintain an affiliation with a congregation.

For any community minister, affiliating with a congregation is a solemn and joyful relationship of accountability as the minister represents Unitarian Universalism to the wider world.

For a congregation, affiliating with a community minister means that we are developing a special and mutually deepening relationship with a minister working outside the congregation.

An affiliated community minister is not paid staff, and is especially not unpaid staff – in other words, they should not be taken advantage of for their skills. As part of the affiliation agreement, a congregation may agree to compensate the minister for some work performed within the congregation such as guest preaching, pastoral summer coverage, consulting with a lay committee, and more. Any volunteering done by the affiliated minister will be freely offered by that minister and not expected, pressured, or cajoled.

In, June of this year, our Board of Trustees voted to enter into a Covenant of Affiliation with the Rev. Dottie Mathews to recognize and affirm her role as a Unitarian Universalist Community Minister, serving the larger community beyond our church.

On Sunday, September 18, we shared a ritual of covenant and welcome with Rev. Mathews. We are so glad and grateful that Dottie has chosen our congregation as her church home and as the site of affiliation and grounding for her unfolding community ministry. We know that our identity and commitment as Unitarian Universalists will grow because of our relationship with Dottie and her work in the wider community!

Beloved Community is… Hopeful

This month we explore HOPE at the UU Church of Columbia…


Not only is another world possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing.” -Arundhati Roy

It feels as though we welcome the holiday season into a space of turmoil this year, as powerful social movements for change help us question all we thought we knew, as continuing violence and displacement and terror around the world tear at our hearts and souls, as the drums of war begin to beat once more.

Yet the stories that human beings have told for millennia in the dark of December are resonant and powerful for just such a time as this: Lamps lit against the dark, great roaring bonfires calling back the sun, a single light that burned on days beyond the possible, a little baby holding the hope of an oppressed nation.

These stories all show us something profound about the nature of hope and our capacity to imagine the possibility of a world – and our hearts within it – made whole at last. These stories show us, in each of their traditions, that Beloved Community begins with hope, and can never come to be without it.

Join us this month as we grapple with the calling of hope – Where shall we place our hope? How can it be authentic and not false? How does it live with the reality of despair? How do we carry the weight of its burden? How do we share this calling to hope?

See you in church!

Hopefully yours, Rev. Molly

(Photo credit: Peter Bowden)

Grappling with Mizzou Student Hunger Strike

In Support of Jonathan Butler and Concerned Student 1950

For five days now, Mizzou grad student and activist Jonathan Butler has engaged in a hunger strike. He has said that he will eat and drink nothing but water until either University of Missouri system president Tim Wolfe resigns or is removed, or until Butler himself dies.

This strategy is dramatic and extreme, and I will admit that it makes me deeply uncomfortable. I am worried for Jonathan’s health. I do not want him to die, and a part of me questions the necessity of such extreme action in relationship to the desired outcome. I am fairly certain that I would not be willing to die in order to ensure the removal of a University President.

But I also know that in our country, black lives are already at great risk and under extreme threat, and have been for centuries. Most recently, we have learned from the epidemic of police shootings of unarmed people of color that black lives may be taken in an instant for no reason other than a white person’s fear or ignorance, and that those who have taken that life will rarely be held accountable.

It is not difficult to imagine that as a black man in the United States, Jonathan already carries a deep experience of the risk of death in a way that is difficult for me to conceive of as a white woman. In light of this, perhaps his hunger strike is not so wildly extreme after all.

For many white onlookers, Jonathan’s tactics are creating a moral crisis where we had not previously perceived one. Yet, if we are listening to students and citizens of color – if we are taking them at their word, as we must – we learn that the crisis was already there. Our University was already a deeply inhospitable place to the flourishing of black lives. Our town and our society were already deeply threatening to the thriving of our African American friends and neighbors.

I must conclude from this that my feelings of deep discomfort are correct, but misplaced. I must be disturbed not by Jonathan’s tactics, but by the moral crisis from which they arise.

Jonathan’s hunger strike, if I will let it, will bring me into a deep and uncomfortable awareness of the threat that black lives face on the University of Missouri campus and beyond. This threat is already dramatic and extreme and Jonathan’s actions point us directly to that reality – a moral crisis that implicates and involves all of us.

I met Jonathan briefly last month at a protest regarding the University of Missouri’s decisions to break ties and agreements with Planned Parenthood (and so doing involve themselves in politically motivated attacks on women’s access to comprehensive healthcare).

At that protest, Jonathan struck me as extremely passionate, engaged, and rational. He brought to our gathering a necessary and sophisticated intersectional analysis of the twining forces of racism, sexism, classism, heterosexism, ablism and more that have created this moral crisis on the University of Missouri campus, in Columbia, and in our society more broadly.

There are those who argue that the demands of the Concerned Student 1950 group are extreme and unreasonable. They argue that the group has been unwilling to engage in dialogue and negotiation with the University.

I will admit entertaining these thoughts myself. But even as I do, I am reminded of the words of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who wrote in his “Letter from the Birmingham Jail”: “You may well ask, ‘Why direct action, why sit-ins, marches, and so forth? Isn’t negotiation a better path?’ You are exactly right in your call for negotiation. Indeed, this is the purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”

These words convict my heart. In the days when Dr. King wrote these words, direct actions in the South presented almost as clear and pressing a danger of death as Jonathan Butler’s decision to go without nutrition. Those radical acts, now made less extraordinary by the normalizing force of history and the proliferation of movies and books accustoming us to their imagery, probably seemed just as extreme, dangerous, and even unreasonable to moderate whites of the day as Jonathan’s hunger strike may seem to us now. Yet those radical actions – those actual sacrifices by protestors and activists – paved the way for profound, though not sufficient, social changes that we must now continue.

Calls for the Concerned Student 1950 group to be more reasonable in their demands sound strikingly close to calls from white moderates during the Civil Rights movement to “just wait” to “be patient” and to “trust the process” of white-run government. To these calls, Dr. King replied: “Frankly, I have never yet engaged in a direct-action movement that was ‘well timed’ according to the timetable of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word ‘wait.’ It rings in the ear of every Negro with a piercing familiarity. This ‘wait’ has almost always meant ‘never.'”

There are those who are deeply involved in negotiations and strategizing work with the University of Missouri around issues of race, racism, and justice. These negotiators are playing an important role in working on policy and strategy that we hope will make a difference.

We must also recognize that those who dramatize and make visible our current moral crisis, who refuse to be comforted, who refuse to wait, who refuse to negotiate or “be reasonable” are also playing an extremely important role in the pursuit of justice.

As a person of faith constantly discerning how I may stand on the side of a radical and inclusive divine love, I find myself called to support the negotiators and the protesters alike (knowing that many, or even most, students and citizens are both all at once). We are called do what we can to ensure that system level policy work is created and enforced and to magnify and affirm the moral dramatization, the divine protest, and the holy impatience of Jonathan Butler, Concerned Student 1950, and other activists.

We must not say “wait,” but must join in the struggle.

I am praying for Jonathan and his strength of body and spirit. I am praying for his courage and well-being and that of other student activists who have been working alongside Jonathan in standing and working and speaking for justice, also at great personal cost. I am praying for wisdom and conversion on the part of our University leaders, that they might allow their own deep discomfort to open their hearts to new learning about our current moral crisis and new imagining about a better Mizzou and a better Columbia. And I am praying for all of us, that we might, each in our way, find our hearts moved by this time of moral crisis into the work of solidarity, justice, and love.

In Faith,

Rev. Molly Housh Gordon

Scholarly Ministry

One of my favorite things about the Unitarian Universalist ministry is its commandment, both spoken and unspoken, to always continue learning and growing in spirit, practice, and intellect.

These next two weeks, I will be taking the opportunity to do all of the above, as I engage in several conferences and continuing education opportunities. 

November 2-4, I will be in Hot Springs, Arkansas on a spiritual retreat with 7 other early career clergy, also graduates of my undergraduate alma mater Hendrix College, exploring what it means spiritually and practically to be religious leaders engaged in public life. In 2014, Hendrix received a Lilly Foundation grant to create an Institute for Clergy Civic Engagement to educate clergy and lead them in reflecting deeply on their role leading in congregations engaged with the issues of the day. I am honored to be a member of their first cohort of fellows, and I am excited that the program will support me in growing in this area, as our congregation continues to light a liberal moral beacon for Mid-Missouri.

November 4-6, I will be stopping in Springfield, Missouri, on my way back up from Arkansas, to take part in an exciting new new theology conference, Subverting the Norm, which will be engaging with radical political theologies, and where one of my theological idols, Catherine Keller, will be giving a keynote. Many of you have heard me preaching some of Keller’s ideas, and it is an intellectually and spiritually exciting opportunity for me to hear from her in person. I am certain the ideas gathered at this conference will also pop up in my preaching and thinking!

Lastly, I’ll be heading to Pere Marquette State park just outside of St. Louis from November 9-12 for my annual Unitarian Universalist study group, Prairie Group. Prairie Group is an historic group devoted to “study thought as it affects religion, religious experience, the church, in any relevant aspect, science, philosophy, political science, history and any other.  It has a special interest in worship and the church and its ministry.” It was founded in the mid-20th century by esteemed colleagues and thinkers in Unitarian Universalism, including giant of 20th century UU and liberal religious thought, James Luther Adams. Attending this group each year, I always feel that truly we stand on the shoulders of giants. This year, for the first time, I will be delivering a paper, which I have prepared, entitled “From Tethers of Captivity to Roots of Flourishing: Collective Sin and Mutual Struggle in the Web that Connects Us” Wish me luck! 

I am so grateful for this rich bounty of learning opportunities and the support of a congregation that helps me to take advantage of them. I know they will enhance my scholarly ministry and give me practical tools, intellectual invigoration, and spiritual renewal to bring back to our work together!